Judicial Bias in the Manafort Trial

The Extraordinary Bias of the Judge in the Manafort Trial: (“It is not unusual for judges to intervene in court proceedings from time to time — to direct the lawyers to move the case along or to admonish them that evidence is repetitive. The judge’s role is to act not as a “mere moderator,” as the Supreme Court noted in Herron v. Southern Pacific in 1931, but as the “governor of the trial” responsible for ensuring the proper conduct of all participants. * * * The performance of U.S. District Court Judge T.S. Ellis III in the trial of Paul Manafort on bank fraud and tax evasion charges has been decidedly unusual.”)

No Comments

Leave a Comment

Each required field is indicated by an asterisk (*). Email addresses will not be published.